You may have a difficult time configuring your wireless adapter to work with BT, it could not recognize wireless networks when I tried to use it on my HP Mini 110.... I bought a rtl8191su dongle, but after hours and hours of research I was unable to properly configure it. Thankfully, I had the opportunity to get an old Dell Inspiron 8600 from a friend, installed BT to its hard drive and BT internet/wifi connectivity worked.... Monitor mode and injection are fine...... at boot, once logged in type startx to pull up the BT GUI and then open a terminal and type /etc/init.d/networking start
If you have BT trouble browse BT forums, use your favorite search engine, or ask a friend in the know.
Feel free to post your Backtrack experiences on our new forums as well, see the menu to the left.
I will be writing more on Backtrack in the coming days.... I'm new to it too.
The Backtrack HCL helps too (Hardware Compatibility List).
Oh and also checkout: http://hak5.org/
]]>Here it is! MalawareBytes' Antimalaware!
Free version works just fine!
Start full scan, wait 45mins - 2hrs for it to finish, then finish the handling the infections/files
The second time this happened(under a different name), Norton Internet Security picked it up apparently, I noticed a dialogue box from Norton, saying it caught a trojan, this was in the middle of running a scan by MalawareBytes.
Strange thing is, both times I got this thing, I wasn't browsing strange sites.... Do you happen to know how and from where it comes?
]]>...A year and change later, Apple has exhibited a pattern of inscrutable tyranny in its numerous, poorly-explained rejections of programs (though in some cases, it's backed down after public embarrassment). Developers have had to guess what's allowed and what's not; witness, for instance, this attempt to piece together Apple's rules, based on what programs have been rejected in the past.
This isn't just a matter of inconvenience or delay for iPhone developers. An App Store rejection amounts to a death sentence--one handed down only after months of work writing code that can't readily be used on another phone platform.
Earlier this month, Apple made this situation even worse by not only rejecting one application--a program Google had written to connect to its Google Voice service--but also evicting such previously-approved, third-party Google Voice software as GV Mobile and Voice Central from the App Store.
There's evidence suggesting that AT&T leaned on Apple to get those applications yanked, but it's Apple's name on the iPhone. Whoever's at fault, people are not amused.
Longtime Mac developer Steven Frank wrote that he was "furious" with Apple and AT&T, calling the iPhone market "toxic." TechCrunch founder Michael Arrington wrote that he'd even pay a $175 early-termination fee to quit the iPhone. Telecom blogger Dave Zatz pronounced himself "about done with both Apple and AT&T if things continue like this."
The Federal Communications Commission has taken notice as well; as my colleague Cecilia Kang wrote on Friday, it's asked Apple and AT&T to explain the Google Voice rejections.....
[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/04/AR2009080401576.html]
The whole "App Store" entity idea is no doubt a hassle for many developers, and seems to be a gamble, the fate of your software rests in the hands of Apple's pencil pushers(it's an expression).
Perhaps there can be, if there isn't already, a database of free, open source apps, not overseen or moderated by Apple, in addition to the regular functioning app store. This would grant developers/hobbyists free reign.... AT&T and Apple need to step it up, or Palm's new Pre may quickly dominate.
]]>
You can also find a demonstration video or two on youtube, or elsewhere.
What Do you Think?
Does Palm Pre have a chance to beat the over-glorified Iphone?
I think it does, if they make it available to different carriers.
Let us know what you think.
Comment.

).
Something about being a techie(especially if you have a nice resume) feels great. I'll be in that direction soon.... sometimes I love spewing tech babble and watch people go "huh?"
Tech ego is definitely a complex phenomenon, Freud, do you have answers?
FREUD: have intercourse
WHAT??

Consumers have accused BioShock of installing a rootkit. An official announcement was made denying the use of any type of rootkit.[6][7]
The game required consumers to activate the game online and originally set a maximum of two activations before they would have to call to get more activations. This was raised to five activations because an incorrect phone number had been printed on the manual and call centers were only in the United States. Users also found that the game had to be activated for each user on the same machine.[8][9]
In 2008, 2K Games removed the activation limit, although users are still required to activate it online.[10]
In May 2008 EA announced that Mass Effect for the PC would be using SecuROM 7.x requiring a reactivation of the software every 10 days.[11] Due to complaints, EA removed the 10-day activation while keeping SecuROM tied to the installation. SecuROM's product activation facility was still used to impose a limit of three times that a customer is allowed to activate the copy of Mass Effect they purchased. The game becomes unplayable "as is" after the activations are used up, until EA's customer support is contacted to reset the activation limit, or until activation is bypassed using one of a number of available tools. Unlike BioShock, uninstalling the game does not refund a previously used activation.[12]
On September 7, 2008 EA released Spore, which uses SecuROM. Despite EA's efforts, Spore has seen relatively substantial rates of illegal piracy among peer-to-peer groups, and with a reported 1.7 million downloads over BitTorrent networks, it was the most-pirated game of 2008.[13][14] EA requires the player to authenticate the game online upon installation.[15] This system was announced after the originally planned system met some opposition from the public, as it would have required authentication every ten days.[16] The product key of an individual copy of the game would only be authenticated on up to three computers.[17] In response to customer complaints, this limit was raised to five computers.[18]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SecuROM
I have heard that Spore has released a fix/removal tool in their update, hopefully BioShock and ME have released fixes (I know Bioware [ ME developer] hasn't yet)
SecuRom TRIES to prevent piracy, but as we saw with Spore, it may be causing the opposite......
There are ways to remove SecuROM stuff from your registry, but then you'd have to download the game from somewhere like Steam, because the Original discs have SecuROM. **STEAM IS NOT A PIRATING UTILITY**

In closing, I hope that SecuROM is improved OR otherwise dropped by devs/publishers. Part of the probkem is that there are so many people pirating. I wish people would realize that by LAW creators that distribute their work,(especially software/music) HAVE A RIGHT TO COMPENSATION.
What do you think?
emaiil us at ni_owner@scitechguru.com
Let us know if we can publish your comment .
Resources/Help:
Removal, etc.
http://reclaimyourgame.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=68&Itemid=40
http://reclaimyourgame.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=77&Itemid=46
A message board thread I started
http://www.swtor.com/community/showthread.php?t=17898
]]>
]]>
since chat is over link may not work, but Krebs' blog is:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/
How do you look at privacy as Krebs asked? Personally, I don't mind if the Gmail bots, scanners, whatever they be called, scan my messages to display relevant ads. The point is as long as it is not scanned by a human, I have no problem with mechanical methods. Even if you use non-web based email, it is quite possible that your Internet Service Provider can scan/read your messages.... I've played around with text encryption here's one of many tools that do as such: http://www.linkedresources.com/tools/encrypter/encrypter_v0.2b1.html
]]>
"A crazy number of readers have written in asking what they should do about unsolicited instant messages coming in from their Gmail accounts. The messages are from a site called ViddyHo urging them to "check out this video." I hope most readers will recognize the link provided in this chat invite for what it is: An invitation to give your Gmail credentials over to criminals......" [ http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/02/just_say_no_to_gmail_viddyho_v.html ]
I checked out the Google Trends page for"ViddyHo" and sure enough Google has issued a warning, and it has gotten Blogger/media attention.
Today's Tech Tip: Do not pay attention to unsolicited, strange looking communications(Emails, IM's, etc.).
]]>